Purpose: To determine whether practitioner-endorsed and practitioner-suggested items for a patient-centered complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) outcomes questionnaire that became the Self-Assessment of Change instrument (developed under the NIH-NCCAM grant R01AT0033214) differ by CAM discipline.
Methods: In-depth semi-structured interviews (n=24), one focus group (n=4), and two group discussions (n=108) were conducted with a convenience sample of CAM practitioners, including naturopathic physicians, Traditional Chinese Medicine practitioners, massage therapists, homeopaths, and energy healers. Qualitative analysis focused on patient outcomes practitioners said they observed in their practice. Outcome items and related comments by practitioners were further distilled for similarities and contrasts by practitioner type. These were then organized into the following pre-existing domains established by the research team: Physical, Cognitive, Emotional, Social, Spiritual, and Whole Person (outcomes that transcend any single outcome domain or construct). Overarching themes that encompassed outcome items were derived when possible.
Results: Considerable overlap was observed among practitioners from different CAM disciplines with regard to types of patient outcomes assessed.
Conclusions: Practitioner data assembled from multiple sources suggest outcome measures derived from a single CAM tradition are likely to overlap considerably with other CAM systems, with some non-generalizable items possible. These data enhance our understanding of diverse issues in questionnaire development, and suggest the need for a few tailored items to capture outcomes for specific CAM disciplines.
Ritenbaugh C, Verhoef M, Fleishman S, et al. Whole systems research: a discipline for studying complementary and alternative medicine. Altern Ther Health Med.. 2003; 9(4):32–6.
Verhoef M, Lewith G, Ritenbaugh C, et al. Complementary and alternative medicine whole systems research: beyond identification of inadequacies of the RCT. Complement Ther Med. 2005; 13(3):206–12.
Fonnebo V, Grimsgaard S, Walach H, et al. Researching complementary and alternative treatments – the gatekeepers are not at home. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007; 7:7.
Bell IR, Caspi O, Schwartz GE, et al. Integrative medicine and systemic outcomes research: issues in the emergence of a new model for primary health care. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(2):133–40.
Verhoef M, Mulkins A, Boon H. Integrative health care: how can we determine whether patients benefit? J Altern Complement Med. 2005; 11(Suppl 1):S57–65.
Maizes V, Rakel D, Niemiec C. Integrative medicine and patient-centered care. Explore. 2009; 5(5):277–89.
https://nccih.nih.gov/about/strategic-plans/2016/Objective-1-Advance-Fundamental-Science-Methods-Development#strategy-3 Accessed October 6, 2017.
Verhoef M, Vanderheyden L, Dryden T, et al. Evaluating complementary and alternative medicine interventions: in search of appropriate patient-centered outcome measures. BMC Complement Altern Med.. 2006; 6:6–38.
Gould A, MacPherson H. Patient perspectives on outcomes after treatment with acupuncture. J Altern Complement Med. 2001; 7(3):261–8.
Bell IR, Koithan M, Gorman MM, Baldwin CM. Homeopathic practitioner views of changes in patients undergoing constitutional treatment for chronic disease. J Altern Complement Med.. 2003; 9(1):39–50.
Paterson C, Britten N. Acupuncture for people with chronic illness: combining qualitative and quantitative outcome assessment. J Altern Complement Med. 2003; 9(5):671–81.
Schulman D. The unexpected outcomes of acupuncture: case reports in support of refocusing research designs. J Altern Complement Med.. 2004; 10(5):785–9.
Elder C, Ritenbaugh C, Mist S, et al. Randomized trial of two mind-body interventions for weight-loss maintenance. J Altern Complement Med. 2007; 13(1):67–78.
White M, Verhoef M, Davison BJ, et al. Seeking mind, body and spirit healing – why some men with prostate cancer choose CAM (complementary and alternative medicine) over conventional cancer treatments. Integr Med Insights. 2008; 3:1–11.
Sutherland EG, Ritenbaugh C, Kiley SJ, et al. An HMO-based prospective pilot study of energy medicine for chronic headaches: whole-person outcomes point to the need for new instrumentation. J Altern Complement Med. 2009; 15(8):819–26.
Hsu C, Bluespruce J, Sherman K, Cherkin D. Unanticipated benefits of CAM therapies for back pain: an exploration of patient experiences. J Altern Complement Med. 2010; 16(2):157–63.
Mulkins AL, Verhoef M. Supporting the transformative process: experiences of cancer patients receiving integrative care. Integr Cancer Ther. 2004; 3(3):230–7.
Koithan M, Verhoef M, Bell IR, et al. The process of whole person healing: “unstuckness” and beyond. J Altern Complement Med. 2007; 13(6):659–68.
Ritenbaugh C, Nicht M, Nichter MA, et al. Developing a patient-centered outcome measure for complementary and alternative medicine therapies I: defining content and format. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2011; 11:135.
Weldring T, Smith SMS. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Health Serv Insights. 2013; 6:61–8.
Howard GS. Response-shift bias: a problem in evaluating interventions with pre/post self-reports. Eval Rev.. 1980; 4(1):93–106.
Rockwell SK, Kohn H. Post-then-pre evaluation: measuring behavior change more accurately. J Ext.. 1989; 27(2):2FEA5.
Drennan J, Hyde A. Controlling response shift bias: the use of the retrospective pre-test design in the evaluation of a master’s programme. Assess Eval High Educ.. 2008; 33(6):699–709.
Thompson JJ, Kelly KL, Ritenbaugh C, et al. Developing a patient-centered outcome measure for complementary and alternative medicine therapies II: refining content validity through cognitive interviews. BMC Complement Alt Med. 2011; 11:136.
Eton DT, Bauer BA, Sood A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in studies of complementary and alternative medicine: problems, solutions, and future directions. Explore.. 2011; 7(5):314–9.
Levin J. Esoteric healing traditions: a conceptual overview. Explore.. 2008; 4(2):101–12.
Ferrell BR, Dow KH, Grant M. Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 1995; 4:523–31.
Guidance for Industry. Patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims. Federal Regist. 2009; 74(35):65132–3.
O’Malley PG. Studying optimal healing environments: challenges and proposals. J Altern Complement Med. 2005; 11 suppl 1:S17–22.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.